焰Journey & Steve Miller Band Best Concert Schedule & Tickets in Bristow, VA on 6/1/2014 in Charlottesville, Virginia For Sale

Use Discount Code: BPDC5 For Additional Savings At Checkout.
In the United Kingdom, Royal Assent is the final step required for a parliamentary bill to become law. Once a bill is presented to the sovereign or the sovereign's representative, he or she has three formal options: Firstly, the sovereign may grant Royal Assent, thereby making the bill an Act of Parliament. Secondly, the sovereign may withhold Royal Assent, thereby vetoing the bill. Finally, the sovereign may reserve Royal Assent; that is to say, defer a decision on the bill until a later time.[1]Under modern constitutional conventions, the sovereign acts on the advice of his or her ministers.[2] Since these ministers most often maintain the support of parliament and are the ones who obtain the passage of bills, it is highly improbable that they would advise the sovereign to withhold assent. An exception is sometimes stated to be if bills are not passed in good faith; though, it has been difficult to make an interpretation on what this might constitute. Hence, in modern practice, Royal Assent is always granted; a refusal to do so would only be appropriate in an emergency situation requiring the use of the monarch's reserve powers.[1]Originally, legislative power was exercised by the sovereign acting on the advice of the Curia Regis, or Royal Council, in which important magnates and clerics participated and which evolved into parliament.[3] The so-called Model Parliament included bishops, abbots, earls, barons, and two knights from each shire and two burgesses from each borough amongst its members. In xxxx, the Earl of Leicester irregularly called a full parliament without royal authorisation.[4] The body eventually came to be divided into two branches: bishops, abbots, earls, and barons formed the House of Lords, while the shire and borough representatives formed the House of Commons.[5] The King would seek the advice and consent of both houses before making any law. During Henry VI's reign, it became regular practice for the two houses to originate legislation in the form of bills, which would not become law unless the sovereign's assent was obtained, as the sovereign was, and still remains, the enactor of laws. Hence, all acts include the clause "Be it enacted by the Queen's (King's) most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows...".[6] The Parliament Acts xxxx and xxxx provide a second potential preamble if the House of Lords is excluded from the process.The power of parliament to pass bills was often thwarted by monarchs. Charles I dissolved parliament in xxxx, after it passed motions critical of and bills seeking to restrict his arbitrary exercise of power. During the Eleven Years of Tyranny that followed, Charles performed legally dubious actions, such as raising taxes without parliament's approval.[7] After the English Civil War, it was accepted that parliament should be summoned to meet regularly, but it was still commonplace for monarchs to refuse Royal Assent to bills. In xxxx, Charles II withheld his assent from a bill "for preserving the Peace of the Kingdom by raising the Militia, and continuing them in Duty for Two and Forty Days,"[8] suggesting that he, not parliament, should control the militia.[9] The last Stuart monarch, Anne, similarly withheld on 11 March xxxx, on the advice of her ministers, her assent from a bill for the settling of Militia in Scotland. No monarch has since withheld Royal Assent on a bill passed by the British parliament.[10]During the rule of the succeeding Hanoverian dynasty, power was gradually exercised more by parliament and the government. The first Hanoverian monarch, George I, relied on his ministers to a greater extent than previous monarchs. Later Hanoverian monarchs attempted to restore royal control over legislation: George III and George IV both openly opposed Catholic Emancipation[11][12] and asserted that to grant assent to a Catholic emancipation bill would violate the Coronation Oath, which required the sovereign to preserve and protect the established Church of England from Papal domination, and would grant rights to individuals who were in league with a foreign power which did not recognize their legitimacy. However, George IV reluctantly granted his assent upon the advice of his ministers.[12] Thus, as the concept of ministerial responsibility has evolved, the power to withhold Royal Assent has fallen into disuse, both in the United Kingdom and in the other Commonwealth realms.In xxxx, George V did take legal advice on withholding Royal Assent from the Government of Ireland Bill, a highly contentious piece of legislation that the Liberal government intended to push through parliament by means of the Parliament Act xxxx. The King decided that he should not withhold assent without "convincing evidence that it would avert a national disaster, or at least have a tranquillizing effect on the distracting conditions of the time."[13]In the United Kingdom, a bill is presented for Royal Assent after it has passed all the required stages in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords.[14][15] Under the Parliament Acts xxxx and xxxx, the House of Commons may, under certain circumstances, direct that a bill be presented for assent despite lack of passage by the House of Lords. Officially, assent is granted by the sovereign or by Lords Commissioners authorised to act by letters patent. It may be granted in parliament or outside parliament; in the latter case, each house must be separately notified before the bill takes effect.The Clerk of the Parliaments, an official of the House of Lords, traditionally states a formula in Anglo-Norman Law French, indicating the sovereign's decision. The granting of Royal Assent to a supply bill is indicated with the words "La Reyne remercie ses bons sujets, accepte leur benevolence, et ainsi le veult",[16] translated as "The Queen thanks her good subjects, accepts their bounty, and wills it so." For other public or private bills, the formula is simply "La Reyne le veult" ("the Queen wills it"). For personal bills, the phrase was "Soit fait comme il est désiré" ("let it be as it is desired"). The appropriate formula for withholding assent is the euphemistic "La Reyne s'avisera" ("the Queen will consider it"). When the sovereign is male, Le Roy is substituted for La Reyne.Before the reign of Henry VIII, the sovereign always granted his or her assent in person. The sovereign, wearing the Imperial State Crown, would be seated on the throne in the Lords chamber, surrounded by heralds and members of the royal court?a scene that nowadays is repeated only at the annual State Opening of Parliament. The Commons, led by their speaker, would listen from the Bar of the Lords, just outside the chamber. The Clerk of the Parliaments presented the bills awaiting assent to the monarch, save that supply bills were traditionally brought up by the speaker. The Clerk of the Crown, standing on the sovereign's right, then read aloud the titles of the bills (in earlier times, the entire text of the bills). The Clerk of the Parliaments, standing on the sovereign's left, responded by stating the appropriate Norman French formula.[17]A new device for granting assent was created during the reign of King Henry VIII. In xxxx, Henry sought to execute his fifth wife, Catherine Howard, whom he accused of committing adultery; the execution was to be authorised not after a trial but by a bill of attainder, to which he would have to personally assent after listening to the entire text. Henry decided that "the repetition of so grievous a Story and the recital of so infamous a crime" in his presence "might reopen a Wound already closing in the Royal Bosom".[18] Therefore, parliament inserted a clause into the Act of Attainder, providing that assent granted by Commissioners "is and ever was and ever shall be, as good" as assent granted by the sovereign personally.[19] The procedure was used only five times during the 16th century, but more often during the 17th and 18th centuries, especially when George III's health began to deteriorate. Queen Victoria became the last monarch to personally grant assent in xxxx.[20][21]When granting assent by commission, the sovereign authorises three or more (normally five) lords who are Privy Counsellors to grant assent in his or her name. The Lords Commissioners, as the monarch's representatives are known, wear scarlet parliamentary robes and sit on a bench between the throne and the Woolsack. The Lords Reading Clerk reads the commission aloud; the senior commissioner then states, "My Lords, in obedience to Her Majesty's Commands, and by virtue of the Commission which has been now read, We do declare and notify to you, the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in Parliament assembled, that Her Majesty has given Her Royal Assent to the several Acts in the Commission mentioned."[22][23]During the xxxxs, the ceremony of assenting by commission was discontinued and is now only employed once a year, at the end of the annual parliamentary session. In xxxx, the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod arrived to summon the House of Commons during a heated debate and several members protested against the disruption by refusing to attend the ceremony. The debacle was repeated in xxxx; this time, when the Speaker left the chair to go to the House of Lords, some members continued to make speeches. As a result, the Royal Assent Act xxxx was passed, creating an additional form for the granting of Royal Assent. Thus, the granting of assent by the monarch in person, or by commission, is still possible, but this third form is used on a day-to-day basis.Under the Royal Assent Act xxxx, Royal Assent can be granted by the sovereign in writing, by means of letters patent, that are presented to the presiding officer of each house of parliament.[17] Then, the presiding officer makes a formal, but simple statement to the house, acquainting each house that Royal Assent has been granted to the acts mentioned. Thus, unlike the granting of Royal Assent by the monarch in person or by Royal Commissioners, the method created by the Royal Assent Act xxxx does not require both houses to meet jointly for the purpose of receiving the notice of Royal Assent. The standard text of the letters patent is set out in The Crown Office (Forms and Proclamations Rules) Order xxxx,[24] with minor amendments in xxxx. Formally, this remains the standard method, a fact that is recited by the wording of the letters patent for the appointment of the Royal Commissioners and by the wording of the letters patent for the granting of Royal Assent in writing under the xxxx Act ("... And forasmuch as We cannot at this time be present in the Higher House of Our said Parliament being the accustomed place for giving Our Royal Assent...").[25]When the act is assented by the sovereign in person, or by empowered Royal Commissioners, Royal Assent is considered given at the moment when the assent is declared in the presence of both houses jointly assembled. When the procedure created by the Royal Assent Act xxxx is followed, assent is considered granted when the presiding officers of both houses, having received the letters patent from the king or queen signifying the assent, have notified their respective house of the grant of Royal Assent.[1] Thus, if each presiding officer makes the announcement at a different time (for instance because one house is not sitting on a certain date), assent is regarded as effective when the second announcement is made. This is important because, under British Law, unless there is any provision to the contrary, an act takes effect on the date on which it receives Royal Assent and that date is not regarded as being the date when the letters patent are signed, or when they are delivered to the presiding officers of each house, but the date in which both houses have been formally acquainted of the conferral of assent to the act.Independently of the method used to signify Royal Assent, it is the responsibility of the Clerk of the Parliaments, once it has been duly notified to both houses, not only to endorse the act in the name of the monarch with the formal Norman French formula, but to certify that assent has been granted. The clerk signs one authentic copy of the bill and inserts the date in which when Royal Assent was notified to the two houses between the text of the enacting clause and the first section of the act.[1] When an act is published, the signature of the clerk is omitted, as is the Norman French formula, should the endorsement have been made in writing. However the date when Royal Assent is notified is printed in brackets.FORASMUCH as various Bills have been passed by the Scottish Parliament and have been submitted to Us for Our Royal Assent by the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament in accordance with the Scotland Act xxxx the short Titles of which Bills are set forth in the Schedule hereto but those Bills by virtue of the Scotland Act xxxx do not become Acts of the Scottish Parliament nor have effect in the Law without Our Royal Assent signified by Letters Patent under Our Scottish Seal (that is Our Seal appointed by the Treaty of Union to be kept and used in Scotland in place of the Great Seal of Scotland) signed with Our own hand and recorded in the Register of the Great Seal We have therefore caused these Our Letters Patent to be made and have signed them and by them do give Our Royal Assent to those Bills COMMANDING ALSO the Keeper of Our Scottish Seal to seal these Our Letters with that Seal.Measures, which were the means by which the National Assembly for Wales passed legislation between xxxx and xxxx, were assented to by the Queen by means of an Order in Council.[30][31] Section 102 of the Government of Wales Act xxxx required the Clerk to the Assembly to present measures passed by the assembly after a four week period during which the Counsel General for Wales or the Attorney General could refer the proposed measure to the Supreme Court for a decision as to whether the measure was within the assembly's legislative competence.FORASMUCH as one or more Bills have been passed by the National Assembly for Wales and have been submitted to Us for Our Royal Assent by the Clerk of the National Assembly for Wales in accordance with the Government of Wales Act xxxx the short Titles of which Bills are set forth in the Schedule hereto but those Bills by virtue of the Government of Wales Act xxxx do not become Acts of the National Assembly for Wales nor have effect in the Law without Our Royal Assent signified by Letters Patent under Our Welsh Seal signed with Our own hand We have therefore caused these Our Letters Patent to be made and have signed them and by them do give Our Royal Assent to those Bills which shall be taken and accepted as good and perfect Acts of the Assembly and be put in due execution accordingly COMMANDING ALSO the Keeper of Our Welsh Seal to seal these Our Letters with that Seal.Under section 14 of the Northern Ireland Act xxxx, a bill which has been approved by the Northern Ireland Assembly is presented to the Queen by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland for Royal Assent after a four week waiting period during which the Attorney General for Northern Ireland may refer the bill to the Supreme Court. Assent is given by means of letters patent in the following form set out in the Northern Ireland (Royal Assent to Bills) Order xxxx.[34]WHEREAS you the Members of the Northern Ireland Assembly have passed a Bill the short title of which is set out in the Schedule hereto but the said Bill does not become an Act of the Northern Ireland Assembly without Our Royal Assent; AND WHEREAS pursuant to the Northern Ireland Act xxxx the said Bill has been submitted to Us by [insert name of Secretary of State] one of Our Principal Secretaries of State for Our Royal Assent;AND WHEREAS pursuant to the Northern Ireland Act xxxx the said Bill has been submitted to Us by [insert name of Secretary of State] one of Our Principal Secretaries of State for Our Royal Assent;We have therefore caused these Our Letters Patent to be made and have signed them and by them We give Our Royal Assent to the said Bill COMMANDING [insert name of Clerk of the Crown for Northern Ireland] the Clerk of the Crown for Northern Ireland to seal these Our Letters with the Great Seal of Northern Ireland AND ALSO COMMANDING that these Our Letters be noti?ed to the Presiding Of?cer of the Northern Ireland Assembly;In Commonwealth realms other than the UK, Royal Assent is granted or withheld by the governor-general, the representative of the sovereign. In realms with federal systems, assent is granted or withheld by the representatives of the sovereign in each state, province, or territory; in Australia, this is the governor (of a state) or administrator (of the Northern Territory); in Canada, this is the lieutenant govenror (of a province). A governor of a state or lieutenant governor of a province may defer assent to the governor-general, who may in turn defer it to the sovereign. In some cases, when a royal tour of a Commonwealth realm is pending, assent may be reserved so that the sovereign may grant it in person. If the governor general is unable to give assent, it can be done by either the Deputy of the Governor General of Canada?the Chief Justice of Canada?or another justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.At both state and federal realms in Australia, assent is used as the means of enforcing a referendum that is required. This is done by providing that it will not be lawful to even submit the law for viceregal assent unless and until it has been approved by the required percentage of the voting populace at a referendum.In New Zealand, section 16 of the Constitution Act xxxx states that "a Bill passed by the House of Representatives shall become law when the Sovereign or the Governor-General assents to it and signs it in token of such assent." This act also states in section 3 that Royal Assent can be given by the sovereign in person or by the governor-general on behalf of the sovereign.[36]While the Royal Assent has not been withheld in the United Kingdom since xxxx, it has often been withheld in British colonies and former colonies by governors acting on royal instructions. In the United States Declaration of Independence, colonists complained that George III "has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good [and] has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them."[37] Even after colonies such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, and Newfoundland were granted responsible government, the British government continued to advise governors-general on the granting of assent. Assent was sometimes reserved in order to allow the British government to examine a bill before advising the governor-general.Since the Balfour Declaration of xxxx and the Statute of Westminster xxxx, governors-general have acted solely on the advice of the local ministers, rather than on that of the British government. As in the United Kingdom, the ministers generally maintain the support of the legislature and are the ones who secure the passage of bills; therefore, they are unlikely to advise the sovereign's representative to withhold assent. The power to withhold the Royal Assent was notably exercised by Alberta's lieutenant governor, John C. Bowen, in xxxx, in respect of three bills passed under William Aberhart's Social Credit government. Two bills sought to put banks under the authority of the province, thereby interfering with the federal government's powers. The third, the Accurate News and Information Bill, purported to force newspapers to print government rebuttals to stories to which the provincial cabinet objected. The unconstitutionality of all three bills was later confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada and by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.[38]In Australia, a technical issue arose with the Royal Assent in both xxxx and xxxx. In xxxx, a bill originating in the House of Representatives was mistakenly submitted to the Governor-General and assented to. However, it was later discovered that it had not been passed by each house. The error arose because two bills of the same title had originated from the House. The Governor-General revoked the first assent, before assenting to the bill which had actually passed. The same procedure was followed to correct a similar error which arose in xxxx.[39]In Commonwealth realms, assent may be granted by the sovereign in person, by the governor-general in person, or by a deputy acting for the governor-general. In all of the realms, however, assent is more often granted or signified outside the legislature, with each house being notified separately.In Australia, the formal ceremony of granting Assent in parliament has not been regularly used since the early 20th century. Now, the bill is sent to the governor-general's residence by the house in which it originated. The governor-general then signs the bill, sending messages to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, who notify their respective houses of the governor-general's action.[40] A similar practice is followed in New Zealand, where the governor-general has not personally granted the Royal Assent in parliament since xxxx.[40]In Canada, the traditional ceremony for granting assent in parliament was regularly used until the 21st century, long after it had been discontinued in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth realms. One result, conceived as part of a string of royal duties intended to demonstrate Canada's status as an independent kingdom, was that King George VI personally assented to nine bills of the Canadian parliament during the xxxx royal tour of Canada?85 years after his great-grandmother, Queen Victoria, had last granted Royal Assent personally in the United Kingdom. Under the Royal Assent Act xxxx, however, the alternative practice of granting assent in writing, with each house being notified separately, was brought into force. As the act also provides, Royal Assent is to be signified?by the governor general, or, more often, by a deputy, usually a Justice of the Supreme Court[20]?in the Senate (as the sovereign is traditionally barred from the House of Commons.[41]) at least twice each calendar year: for the first appropriation measure and for at least one other act, usually the first non-appropriation measure passed. However, the act provides that a grant of Royal Assent is not rendered invalid by a failure to employ the traditional ceremony where required.Instead, the monarch directly grants Royal Assent by Order in Council.[43] Assent is granted or refused on the advice of the Lord Chancellor. A recent example when assent was refused (or, more correctly, when the Lord Chancellor declined to present the law for assent) was in xxxx, concerning reforms to the constitution of the Chief Pleas of Sark.[44] (A revised version of the proposed reforms was subsequently given assent.[45]) In xxxx, campaigners against a law that sought to reduce the number of senators in the states of Jersey petitioned the Privy Council to advise the Queen to refuse Royal Assent.[46] An Order in Council of 13 July xxxx established new rules for the consideration of petitions against granting Royal Assent.[47]Special procedures apply to legislation passed by Tynwald, the legislature of the Isle of Man. Before the lordship of the Island was purchased by the British Crown in xxxx (the Revestment), the assent of the Lord of Mann to a bill was signified by letter to the governor.[48] After xxxx, Royal Assent was at first signified by letter from the Secretary of State to the governor;[49] but, during the British Regency, the practice began of granting Royal Assent by Order in Council,[50] which continues to this day, though limited to exceptional cases since xxxx.In xxxx, an Order in Council delegated to the lieutenant governor the power to grant Royal Assent to bills passed by Tynwald.[51] The lieutenant governor must refer any bill to the then Lord Chancellor's Department (now Ministry of Justice) for advice, on which he is required to act, and certain types of bill are reserved to the monarch, in which case the former procedure is followed.Royal Assent is not sufficient to give legal effect to an Act of Tynwald. By ancient custom, an act did not come into force until it had been promulgated at an open-air sitting of Tynwald, usually held on Tynwald Hill at St John's on St John's Day (24 June), but, since the adoption of the Gregorian calendar in xxxx,[52] on 5 July (or on the following Monday[53] if 5 July is a Saturday or Sunday). Promulgation originally consisted of the reading of the Act in English and Manx; but, after xxxx the reading of the title of the act and a summary of each section were sufficient.[54] This was reduced in xxxx to the titles and a memorandum of the object and purport of the act,[55] and, since xxxx, only the short title and a summary of the long title have been read.[56]An emergency procedure enabling an act to come into force on Royal Assent being announced at an ordinary sitting of Tynwald, subject to its being promulgated within 12 months, was introduced in xxxx;[57] since xxxx, this has been the normal procedure and an act ceases to have effect unless promulgated within 18 months after Royal Assent is announced in Tynwald.[58]Since xxxx, the Sodor and Man Diocesan Synod has had power to enact measures making provision "with respect to any matter concerning the Church of England in the Island". If approved by Tynwald, a measure "shall have the force and effect of an Act of Tynwald upon the Royal Assent thereto being announced to Tynwald".[59] Between xxxx and xxxx, the Synod had similar powers, but limited to the extension to the Isle of Man of measures of the General Synod.[60] Before xxxx, Royal Assent was granted by Order in Council, as for a bill, but the power to grant Royal Assent to measures has now been delegated to the lieutenant governor.[61] A Measure does not require promulgation.[62]In Belgium the sanction royale has the same legal effect as Royal Assent, with the government held responsible if the king or queen refuses the royal sanction. The monarch promulgates the law, meaning that he formally publishes the law and orders that it be executed. In xxxx, when King Baudouin advised the government he could not, in conscience, sign a bill decriminalizing abortion, the Council of Ministers declared him incapable of exercising his powers at his own request. In accordance with the Belgian constitution, upon the declaration of the sovereign's incapacity, the Council of Ministers assumed the powers of the head of state until parliament could rule on the King's incapacity and appoint a regent. The bill was then assented to by all members of the Council of Ministers on the King's behalf. Both houses of parliament declared the King capable of exercising his powers again the next day.[64]The constitution of Jordan grants its monarch the right to withhold assent to laws passed by its parliament. Article 93 of that document gives the King of Jordan six months to sign or veto any legislation sent to him from the National Assembly; if he vetoes it within that timeframe, the assembly may override his veto by a two-thirds vote of both houses; otherwise, the law does not go into effect (but it may be reconsidered in the next session of the Assembly). If the king fails to act within six months of the bill being presented to him, it becomes law without his signature.[65]Liechtenstein allows its monarch to withhold Royal Assent of his or her own will.[66] When Prince Hans Adam II, in an unprecedented move for the constitutional monarchy, refused to give Royal Assent to a bill legalising abortion, he pushed for a bill to give him sweeping powers in the government beyond only ceremonial matters, including the power to appoint judges. Though in a moment of pique, he had once quipped that he would sell the country to Bill Gates and rename it Microsoft, he did seriously threaten to move to Austria with the Princely Family.[67] The bill did pass, and the Prince now has many additional powers, including the power to withhold Royal Assent on his own accord.After the House of Representatives has debated the law, it either approves it and sends it to the Senate with the text "The Second Chamber of the States-General sends the following approved proposal of law to the First Chamber", or it rejects it and returns it to the government with the text "The Second Chamber of the States-General has rejected the accompanying proposal of law." If the upper house then approves the law, it sends it back to the government with the text "To the King, The States-General have accepted the proposal of law as it is offered here."The government, consisting of the monarch and the ministers, will then usually approve the proposal and the sovereign and one of the ministers signs the proposal with the addition of an enacting clause, thereafter notifying the States-General that "The King assents to the proposal." It has happened in exceptional circumstances that the government does not approve a law that has been passed in parliament. In such a case, neither the monarch nor a minister will sign the bill, notifying the States-General that "The King will keep the proposal under advisement." A law that has received Royal Assent will be published in the State Magazine, with the original being kept in the archives of the King's Offices.Articles 77?79 of the Norwegian constitution specifically grant the King of Norway the right to withhold Royal Assent from any bill passed by the Storting, or parliament.[69] Should the king ever choose to exercise this privilege, Article 79 provides a means by which his veto may be overridden: "If a Bill has been passed unaltered by two sessions of the Storting, constituted after two separate successive elections and separated from each other by at least two intervening sessions of the Storting, without a divergent Bill having been passed by any Storting in the period between the first and last adoption, and it is then submitted to the King with a petition that His Majesty shall not refuse his assent to a Bill which, after the most mature deliberation, the Storting considers to be beneficial, it shall become law even if the Royal Assent is not accorded before the Storting goes into recess."[69]Title IV of the xxxx Spanish constitution invests the Consentimiento Real (Royal Assent) and promulgation (publication) of laws with the King of Spain, while Title III, The Cortes Generales, Chapter 2, Drafting of Bills, outlines the method by which bills are passed. According to Article 91, within fifteen days of passage of a bill by the Cortes Generales, the king shall give his assent and publish the new law. Article 92 invests the king with the right to call for a referendum, on the advice of the president of the government (commonly referred to in English as the prime minister) and the authorization of the cortes.No provision within the constitution grants the king an ability to veto legislation directly; however, no provision prohibits the king from withholding Royal Assent, which effectively constitutes a veto. When the Spanish media asked King Juan Carlos if he would endorse the bill legalizing same-sex marriages, he answered "Soy el Rey de España y no el de Bélgica" ("I am the King of Spain and not that of Belgium")?a reference to King Baudouin I of Belgium, who had refused to sign the Belgian law legalising abortion.[70] The King gave Royal Assent to Law 13/xxxx on 1 July xxxx; the law was gazetted in the Boletín Oficial del Estado on 2 July and came into effect on 3 July xxxx.[71] Likewise, in xxxx, King Juan Carlos gave Royal Assent to a law permitting abortion on demand.
&#xxxx; Location: Charlottesville, Concert on 6/1/xxxx
&#xxxx; Post ID: xxxxxxxx charlottesville
//
//]]>
Email this ad
Play it safe. Avoid Scammers.
Most of the time, transactions outside of your local area involving money orders, cashier checks, wire transfers or shipping (especially overseas shipping) are scams or frauds.
Report all scam attempts to abuse@backpage.com.
//
//]]>
Account Login | Affiliate Program | Promote Us | Help | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | User Safety | backpage.com  © Copyright xxxx
charlottesville.backpage.com is an interactive computer service that enables access by multiple users and should not be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Jiffy Lube Live (Formerly Nissan Pavilion)
Bristow, VA
Sunday
6/1/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Our Customer Service department can help anyone looking for that special ticket for one fan or assist in Large Group sales for those wanting to attend the concerts with friends. We are Event Tickets Specialists you can trust!
Don't want to miss The Journey & Steve Miller Band in concert? See The Journey & Steve Miller Band in concert by using the link below for an updated tour schedule. The Journey & Steve Miller Band may add more dates to the tour in the future:
Journey & Steve Miller Band xxxx Tour Dates & Tickets Info
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Sleep Train Amphitheatre - Chula Vista (formerly Cricket Wireless Amphitheatre)
Chula Vista, CA
Thursday
5/15/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Hollywood Bowl
Los Angeles, CA
Friday
5/16/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Ak-Chin Pavilion (Formerly Desert Sky Pavilion)
Phoenix, AZ
Sunday
5/18/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Isleta Amphitheater (formerly Hard Rock Pavilion)
Albuquerque, NM
Tuesday
5/20/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
AT&T Center
San Antonio, TX
Thursday
5/22/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
The Cynthia Woods Mitchell Pavilion
Spring, TX
Friday
5/23/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Gexa Energy Pavilion (Formerly Superpages.com Center)
Dallas, TX
Sunday
5/25/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Oak Mountain Amphitheatre - AL
Birmingham, AL
Tuesday
5/27/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Walnut Creek Amphitheatre (formerly TWC Music Pavilion)
Raleigh, NC
Thursday
5/29/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Aarons Amphitheatre At Lakewood (formerly Lakewood Amphitheatre)
Atlanta, GA
Friday
5/30/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Jiffy Lube Live (Formerly Nissan Pavilion)
Bristow, VA
Sunday
6/1/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Toyota Pavilion At Montage Mountain (formerly Ford Pavilion)
Scranton, PA
Tuesday
6/10/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
PNC Bank Arts Center
Holmdel, NJ
Wednesday
6/11/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Xfinity Center - MA (formerly Comcast Center)
Mansfield, MA
Friday
6/13/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Saratoga Performing Arts Center
Saratoga Springs, NY
Saturday
6/14/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Nikon at Jones Beach Theater
Wantagh, NY
Monday
6/16/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Bethel Woods Center For The Arts
Bethel, NY
Tuesday
6/17/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Molson Canadian Amphitheatre
Toronto, Canada
Thursday
6/19/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Farm Bureau Live at Virginia Beach (Formerly Virginia Beach Amphitheatre)
Virginia Beach, VA
Saturday
6/21/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Susquehanna Bank Center
Camden, NJ
Sunday
6/22/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Darien Lake Performing Arts Center
Darien Center, NY
Tuesday
6/24/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Riverbend Music Center
Cincinnati, OH
Wednesday
6/25/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
First Niagara Pavilion (Formerly Post Gazette Pavilion At Star Lake)
Burgettstown, PA
Friday
6/27/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Klipsch Music Center (Formerly Verizon Wireless Music Center - IN)
Noblesville, IN
Saturday
6/28/xxxx
7:30 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Blossom Music Center
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Tuesday
7/8/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
DTE Energy Music Theatre
Clarkston, MI
Wednesday
7/9/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Verizon Wireless Amphitheater - MO
Maryland Heights, MO
Friday
7/11/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
First Midwest Bank Amphitheatre (formerly Tweeter Center-il)
Tinley Park, IL
Saturday
7/12/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Starlight Theatre
Kansas City, MO
Monday
7/14/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Pepsi Center - Denver
Denver, CO
Wednesday
7/16/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Usana Amphitheatre
Salt Lake City, UT
Thursday
7/17/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
White River Amphitheatre
Auburn, WA
Saturday
7/19/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Sleep Country Amphitheater (Formerly Clark County Amphitheater)
Ridgefield, WA
Sunday
7/20/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
California Mid-state Fair Grounds
Paso Robles, CA
Wednesday
7/23/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Sleep Train Amphitheatre
Wheatland, CA
Friday
7/25/xxxx
6:45 PM
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Shoreline Amphitheatre - CA
Mountain View, CA
Saturday
7/26/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Sleep Train Pavilion (Formerly Chronicle Pavilion)
Concord, CA
Tuesday
7/29/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets
Journey & Steve Miller Band
Mandalay Bay - Events Center
Las Vegas, NV
Friday
8/1/xxxx
TBD
View Best Journey & Steve Miller Band Tickets